Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:45:01 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score99.286.577.977.0
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.98%100.00%100.00%99.91%
p50 latency19.6 ms87.2 ms107.1 ms119.6 ms
p95 latency36.2 ms99.8 ms194.8 ms210.4 ms
p99 latency172.6 ms124.1 ms247.0 ms234.1 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.34 blocks0.47 blocks0.39 blocks
Rate limited006,1372
Unsupported00810
Samples38,45837,8448,80938,401

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.6points

  • Latency+12.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +12.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.2points

  • Latency+21.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.1points

  • Latency+22.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time