Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 08:57:12 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score98.980.370.069.5
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%100.00%99.91%
p50 latency18.4 ms87.6 ms105.1 ms119.4 ms
p95 latency32.6 ms104.3 ms194.3 ms207.9 ms
p99 latency95.2 ms139.2 ms251.0 ms227.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.36 blocks0.61 blocks0.42 blocks
Rate limited001,5211
Unsupported00170
Samples9,6259,4992,1869,616

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+18.6points

  • Latency+18.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+28.9points

  • Latency+28.7
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +28.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.4points

  • Latency+29.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time