Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:26:37 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1347
Score99.486.882.569.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.93%99.95%100.00%99.93%
p50 latency19.6 ms33.1 ms87.8 ms122.8 ms
p95 latency35.1 ms77.8 ms99.8 ms212.2 ms
p99 latency127.1 ms175.1 ms123.1 ms234.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.36 blocks0.34 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited04501
Unsupported0000
Samples8,8228,6828,6668,806

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+12.5points

  • Latency+12.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.9points

  • Latency+17.1
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time