Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-27 05:17:58 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1247
Score99.498.081.269.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%100.00%100.00%99.88%
p50 latency17.3 ms19.6 ms87.4 ms118.1 ms
p95 latency28.7 ms33.1 ms96.2 ms206.5 ms
p99 latency49.6 ms60.8 ms108.7 ms224.8 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.46 blocks0.48 blocks0.38 blocks0.41 blocks
Rate limited0000
Unsupported0000
Samples1,6401,6101,5891,610

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+1.4points

  • Latency+1.4
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +1.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsNodeReal

+18.2points

  • Latency+18.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+30.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +30.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time