Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:41:44 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank2347
Score94.593.288.678.0
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.79%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms87.3 ms118.5 ms
p95 latency65.5 ms72.3 ms99.8 ms209.3 ms
p99 latency853.6 ms168.8 ms123.1 ms232.9 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited057702
Unsupported0000
Samples90,78389,28689,24690,615

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+1.3points

  • Latency+1.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+5.9points

  • Latency+6.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+16.4points

  • Latency+16.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time