Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:27:43 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2479
Score98.579.969.50.0
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedPoor
Availability100.00%100.00%99.92%0.00%
p50 latency18.4 ms87.4 ms118.7 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency32.0 ms105.2 ms207.0 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency68.3 ms141.9 ms224.4 ms0.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.48 blocks0.35 blocks0.41 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0001,522
Unsupported0000
Samples8,8408,7188,8221,746

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+18.7points

  • Latency+18.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.1points

  • Latency+29.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+98.5points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Latency*+29.1
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Head freshness*+9.4

The parts add to +98.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time