Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:41:19 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal | MEV Blocker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Score | 99.4 | 83.0 | 69.5 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.98% | 100.00% | 99.89% |
| p50 latency | 20.3 ms | 87.6 ms | 124.5 ms |
| p95 latency | 33.8 ms | 99.3 ms | 216.6 ms |
| p99 latency | 63.6 ms | 126.1 ms | 242.3 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.48 blocks | 0.33 blocks | 0.39 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 9,231 | 9,057 | 9,199 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+16.5points
- Latency+16.6
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +16.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsMEV Blocker
+29.9points
- Latency+30.0
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.