Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 11:17:35 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2578
Score95.585.277.862.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.89%85.27%
p50 latency19.8 ms104.7 ms118.7 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency57.0 ms122.1 ms209.4 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency802.2 ms145.7 ms232.7 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,134317,420
Unsupported0000
Samples101,466100,917101,29021,361

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+10.4points

  • Latency+10.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +10.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+17.8points

  • Latency+17.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.0points

  • Latency+26.2
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time