Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:37:04 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMEV Blocker1RPCCloudflare
Rank2789
Score94.278.162.655.8
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.96%99.89%85.50%23.10%
p50 latency19.9 ms118.5 ms225.7 ms15.2 ms
p95 latency68.1 ms209.4 ms4391.3 ms88.6 ms
p99 latency863.5 ms233.1 ms7602.5 ms254.1 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%97.48%100.00%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0215,27677
Unsupported0002,615
Samples89,04288,88518,90688,849

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+16.1points

  • Latency+16.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+31.5points

  • Latency+24.8
  • Availability+5.8
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +31.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsCloudflare

+38.3points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2
  • Latency+1.5

The parts add to +38.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time