Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:44:13 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2378
Score94.593.278.062.6
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.89%85.50%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms118.5 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency65.3 ms72.3 ms209.3 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency853.1 ms168.8 ms232.9 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.36 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0577215,588
Unsupported0000
Samples90,85889,35790,68719,263

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+1.3points

  • Latency+1.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+16.5points

  • Latency+16.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+31.9points

  • Latency+25.1
  • Availability+5.8
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +31.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time