Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:51:56 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1379
Score99.487.869.50.0
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedPoor
Availability99.94%99.95%99.94%0.00%
p50 latency19.3 ms32.1 ms120.5 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency34.4 ms70.0 ms209.6 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency122.0 ms163.1 ms228.2 ms0.0 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.48 blocks0.36 blocks0.41 blocksno cohort
Rate limited04611,638
Unsupported0000
Samples9,4899,3419,4821,876

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+11.6points

  • Latency+11.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+99.4points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Latency*+30.0
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Head freshness*+9.4

The parts add to +99.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time