Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:49:22 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2378
Score95.492.577.762.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.89%85.27%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms118.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency57.5 ms72.0 ms209.3 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency805.7 ms168.0 ms232.7 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0625317,288
Unsupported0000
Samples100,69699,051100,52221,210

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+2.9points

  • Latency+3.1
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +2.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+17.7points

  • Latency+17.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+32.9points

  • Latency+26.1
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +32.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time