Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:41:44 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank678
Score78.978.062.6
StatusGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.89%85.50%
p50 latency106.5 ms118.5 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency195.9 ms209.3 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency244.4 ms232.9 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.47 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited14,600215,576
Unsupported18000
Samples20,99790,61519,250

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Merkle, the highest scorer of those selected.

MerklevsMEV Blocker

+0.9points

  • Latency+0.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Merklevs1RPC

+16.3points

  • Latency+9.5
  • Availability+5.8
  • Head freshness+0.5
  • Correctness+0.5

The parts add to +16.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time