Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 08:57:12 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeMEV BlockerCloudflare
Rank178
Score99.469.550.9
StatusExcellentDegradedDegraded
Availability99.99%99.91%23.14%
p50 latency18.5 ms119.4 ms13.1 ms
p95 latency30.9 ms207.9 ms72.6 ms
p99 latency64.5 ms227.0 ms119.9 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.42 blocksno cohort
Rate limited017
Unsupported00287
Samples9,7149,6169,647

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+30.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +30.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+48.5points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Latency+11.6
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +48.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time