Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:15:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeMEV Blocker1RPCCloudflare
Rank2789
Score99.177.258.756.0
StatusExcellentGoodDegradedDegraded
Availability99.99%99.95%76.33%23.19%
p50 latency17.2 ms117.8 ms2024.4 ms12.6 ms
p95 latency34.2 ms209.1 ms6590.4 ms69.4 ms
p99 latency84.8 ms228.9 ms9196.2 ms247.4 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%96.63%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.39 blocks0.95 blocksno cohort
Rate limited021,4386
Unsupported000247
Samples8,5798,4942,0088,519

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.9points

  • Latency+22.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+40.4points

  • Latency+29.7
  • Availability+9.5
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsCloudflare

+43.1points

  • Availability+29.7
  • Head freshness*+9.4
  • Latency+6.3
  • Correctness2.2

The parts add to +43.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time