Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:39:59 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | MEV Blocker | Cloudflare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Score | 99.4 | 76.8 | 53.4 |
| Status | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.98% | 99.92% | 23.15% |
| p50 latency | 19.3 ms | 121.1 ms | 14.9 ms |
| p95 latency | 34.1 ms | 212.1 ms | 86.6 ms |
| p99 latency | 76.1 ms | 235.3 ms | 224.5 ms |
| Correctness | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.40 blocks | no cohort |
| Rate limited | 0 | 3 | 55 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 1,128 |
| Samples | 38,300 | 38,272 | 38,304 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsMEV Blocker
+22.6points
- Latency+22.7
- Head freshness−0.1
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness+0.0
The parts add to +22.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsCloudflare
+46.0points
- Availability+29.7
- Head freshness*+9.4
- Latency+9.1
- Correctness−2.2
The parts add to +46.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.