Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 3.0 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:29:15 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score97.087.578.477.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.84%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms87.4 ms107.0 ms119.3 ms
p95 latency49.2 ms100.0 ms195.5 ms210.5 ms
p99 latency727.4 ms125.8 ms242.4 ms234.0 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.34 blocks0.49 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0018,3943
Unsupported002250
Samples114,759112,81826,576114,541

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+9.4points

  • Latency+9.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +9.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.6points

  • Latency+18.6
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.5points

  • Latency+19.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time