Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.2 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:56:32 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank1367
Score99.493.879.278.2
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.97%99.96%99.98%99.88%
p50 latency18.3 ms19.9 ms106.6 ms118.5 ms
p95 latency33.7 ms71.8 ms195.9 ms209.5 ms
p99 latency70.3 ms877.7 ms243.1 ms233.4 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.51 blocks0.46 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0013,9082
Unsupported001700
Samples86,97886,33220,02186,167

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+5.6points

  • Latency+5.6
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.2points

  • Latency+20.3
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +20.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.2points

  • Latency+21.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time