Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 01:54:21 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1347
Score99.489.886.176.7
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.99%99.86%99.99%99.97%
p50 latency18.9 ms34.1 ms87.0 ms118.4 ms
p95 latency32.2 ms73.4 ms99.3 ms210.2 ms
p99 latency71.6 ms179.6 ms122.1 ms232.3 ms
Correctness100.00%99.98%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.39 blocks0.33 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited03302
Unsupported0000
Samples9,5329,4079,4059,542

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+9.6points

  • Latency+9.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +9.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.3points

  • Latency+13.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Correctness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0

The parts add to +13.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.7points

  • Latency+22.8
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +22.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time