Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:57:54 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1247
Score99.499.286.677.6
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability100.00%99.99%99.99%99.95%
p50 latency18.9 ms17.2 ms86.8 ms117.8 ms
p95 latency32.6 ms33.8 ms98.7 ms208.5 ms
p99 latency69.6 ms83.0 ms117.4 ms228.6 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.48 blocks0.33 blocks0.39 blocks
Rate limited0002
Unsupported0000
Samples9,6369,7399,5279,642

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.2points

  • Latency+0.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.9points

  • Latency+13.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+21.9points

  • Latency+21.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +21.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time