Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:12:49 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2578
Score96.185.077.662.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.98%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms104.8 ms118.8 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency53.8 ms122.3 ms209.7 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency775.8 ms146.3 ms233.3 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,154318,232
Unsupported0000
Samples106,209105,642106,00822,297

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+11.1points

  • Latency+11.2
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+18.4points

  • Latency+18.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.6points

  • Latency+26.7
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time