Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

1h window · 60 minutes observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:27:06 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1347
Score99.484.683.069.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability100.00%99.94%100.00%99.87%
p50 latency20.9 ms34.0 ms87.3 ms124.4 ms
p95 latency34.5 ms90.1 ms98.8 ms217.7 ms
p99 latency66.4 ms193.7 ms120.8 ms236.3 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.38 blocks0.32 blocks0.41 blocks
Rate limited01000
Unsupported0000
Samples1,6041,5701,5631,598

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+14.8points

  • Latency+14.9
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +14.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.4points

  • Latency+16.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+30.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +30.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time