Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 12:27:43 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank2346
Score95.792.487.978.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.82%99.98%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms106.5 ms
p95 latency55.7 ms72.1 ms100.0 ms196.3 ms
p99 latency792.1 ms168.5 ms125.7 ms243.4 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited0637016,619
Unsupported000201
Samples103,369101,670101,62423,933

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+3.4points

  • Latency+3.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+7.9points

  • Latency+8.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+17.2points

  • Latency+17.2
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +17.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time