Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 03:22:05 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMerkleMEV Blocker
Rank2467
Score94.188.879.078.1
StatusExcellentGoodGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.79%99.98%99.89%
p50 latency19.9 ms87.3 ms106.6 ms118.5 ms
p95 latency68.7 ms99.8 ms196.0 ms209.4 ms
p99 latency865.6 ms123.4 ms243.1 ms233.1 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.51 blocks0.35 blocks0.46 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0014,2762
Unsupported001770
Samples88,64087,12420,53588,480

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+5.3points

  • Latency+5.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +5.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+15.1points

  • Latency+15.1
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +15.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+16.0points

  • Latency+16.1
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time