Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:02:11 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1247
Score99.495.082.969.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%100.00%99.89%
p50 latency20.2 ms25.5 ms87.6 ms125.2 ms
p95 latency33.4 ms50.1 ms99.6 ms217.6 ms
p99 latency65.2 ms113.6 ms130.8 ms244.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.48 blocks0.33 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited0000
Unsupported0000
Samples8,1658,2288,0168,139

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+4.4points

  • Latency+4.4
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0
  • Head freshness0.0

The parts add to +4.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+16.5points

  • Latency+16.7
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time