Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.7 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 13:42:26 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeReal1RPC
Rank2348
Score96.092.387.862.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.82%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency54.4 ms71.9 ms100.0 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency780.4 ms168.1 ms125.7 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0641018,087
Unsupported0000
Samples105,388103,648103,61522,132

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+3.6points

  • Latency+3.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+8.2points

  • Latency+8.3
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +8.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+33.5points

  • Latency+26.6
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +33.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time