Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 05:04:25 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | dRPC | NodeReal | 1RPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Score | 94.6 | 93.1 | 88.5 | 62.5 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Degraded |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.93% | 99.80% | 85.27% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 33.9 ms | 87.3 ms | 225.7 ms |
| p95 latency | 64.5 ms | 72.2 ms | 99.8 ms | 4391.3 ms |
| p99 latency | 849.9 ms | 168.8 ms | 123.0 ms | 7602.5 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% | 97.48% |
| Head lag | 0.50 blocks | 0.36 blocks | 0.35 blocks | 0.91 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 579 | 0 | 15,676 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 91,400 | 89,890 | 89,853 | 19,370 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsdRPC
+1.4points
- Latency+1.6
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +1.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+6.1points
- Latency+6.2
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +6.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
Tenderlyvs1RPC
+32.0points
- Latency+25.2
- Availability+5.9
- Correctness+0.5
- Head freshness+0.5
The parts add to +32.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.