Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 17:01:01 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodedRPCNodeReal
Rank1234
Score99.498.391.186.6
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentGood
Availability99.98%99.97%99.93%100.00%
p50 latency19.3 ms20.2 ms33.7 ms87.3 ms
p95 latency34.0 ms39.6 ms70.0 ms100.1 ms
p99 latency75.7 ms95.6 ms170.5 ms130.3 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.37 blocks0.34 blocks
Rate limited001340
Unsupported0000
Samples37,24737,60636,67136,671

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+1.1points

  • Latency+1.1
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.3points

  • Latency+8.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.8points

  • Latency+13.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time