Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:37:58 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeNodeRealMerkle
Rank1246
Score99.498.186.778.0
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.98%99.99%100.00%100.00%
p50 latency19.3 ms20.7 ms87.4 ms107.4 ms
p95 latency33.9 ms40.5 ms100.0 ms193.7 ms
p99 latency75.5 ms98.0 ms129.8 ms235.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.48 blocks0.48 blocks0.34 blocks0.53 blocks
Rate limited0006,042
Unsupported00075
Samples38,25838,62237,6618,763

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+1.3points

  • Latency+1.3
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +1.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+12.7points

  • Latency+12.9
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.4
  • Head freshness+0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time