Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 09:46:06 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | PublicNode | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Score | 99.4 | 99.3 | 86.4 |
| Status | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.97% | 99.97% | 100.00% |
| p50 latency | 19.3 ms | 18.6 ms | 87.2 ms |
| p95 latency | 35.3 ms | 35.7 ms | 100.3 ms |
| p99 latency | 125.3 ms | 75.6 ms | 128.5 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Head lag | 0.49 blocks | 0.49 blocks | 0.34 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 38,464 | 38,815 | 37,877 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsPublicNode
+0.1points
- Latency+0.1
- Head freshness−0.0
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +0.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+13.0points
- Latency+13.1
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability−0.0
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +13.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.