Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:02:43 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMerkle
Rank2346
Score95.392.688.078.6
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.93%99.81%99.98%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.8 ms87.4 ms106.4 ms
p95 latency58.4 ms72.0 ms100.1 ms196.0 ms
p99 latency811.5 ms167.6 ms125.9 ms243.1 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%100.00%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.35 blocks0.48 blocks
Rate limited0616015,999
Unsupported000197
Samples99,44697,80997,77723,014

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+2.7points

  • Latency+2.9
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +2.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+7.3points

  • Latency+7.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+16.7points

  • Latency+16.7
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +16.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time