Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:12:46 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank2347
Score99.390.886.476.9
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.98%99.91%100.00%99.91%
p50 latency19.5 ms34.2 ms87.1 ms119.8 ms
p95 latency35.5 ms70.2 ms100.3 ms210.0 ms
p99 latency126.3 ms172.9 ms129.4 ms232.0 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%99.99%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.38 blocks0.34 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited013902
Unsupported0000
Samples37,57136,98936,99637,531

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+8.5points

  • Latency+8.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +8.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.0points

  • Latency+13.2
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +13.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.4points

  • Latency+22.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time