Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:06:19 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank1347
Score99.487.880.569.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.93%99.94%100.00%99.93%
p50 latency19.1 ms32.0 ms87.9 ms120.3 ms
p95 latency34.1 ms69.3 ms106.8 ms209.3 ms
p99 latency138.3 ms160.5 ms144.4 ms226.4 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%100.00%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.35 blocks0.35 blocks0.41 blocks
Rate limited03701
Unsupported0000
Samples8,2568,1288,1368,256

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+11.6points

  • Latency+11.7
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +11.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+18.8points

  • Latency+19.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time