Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:35:48 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCNodeRealMEV Blocker
Rank2347
Score96.892.087.677.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodGood
Availability99.96%99.94%99.84%99.89%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms87.4 ms119.2 ms
p95 latency49.8 ms71.8 ms100.0 ms210.3 ms
p99 latency734.3 ms170.3 ms125.9 ms234.0 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%99.99%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.34 blocks0.40 blocks
Rate limited066003
Unsupported0000
Samples113,314111,448111,403113,097

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.8points

  • Latency+4.9
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+9.3points

  • Latency+9.4
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +9.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.3points

  • Latency+19.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time