Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 07:26:49 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2478
Score99.486.476.958.2
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%100.00%99.91%74.93%
p50 latency19.5 ms87.1 ms119.8 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.5 ms100.3 ms210.0 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency128.3 ms129.3 ms232.0 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.34 blocks0.40 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited0026,511
Unsupported0000
Samples37,94637,36437,9097,815

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+13.0points

  • Latency+13.2
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +13.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+22.5points

  • Latency+22.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +22.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+41.2points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+10.0
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +41.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time