Providers
Compare RPC providers on measured data
The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.
Providers on Ethereum
Side by side
30d window · 2.3 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:46:15 UTC
| Metric | Tenderly | NodeReal |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 2 | 4 |
| Score | 94.5 | 88.6 |
| Status | Excellent | Good |
| Availability | 99.96% | 99.80% |
| p50 latency | 19.8 ms | 87.3 ms |
| p95 latency | 65.2 ms | 99.8 ms |
| p99 latency | 852.8 ms | 123.1 ms |
| Correctness | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Head lag | 0.51 blocks | 0.35 blocks |
| Rate limited | 0 | 0 |
| Unsupported | 0 | 0 |
| Samples | 90,907 | 89,367 |
9 providers scored against each other.
Where the gap comes from
Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.
TenderlyvsNodeReal
+5.9points
- Latency+6.0
- Head freshness−0.2
- Availability+0.1
- Correctness−0.0
The parts add to +5.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.