Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 3.0 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:26:35 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeNodeRealBlast API1RPC
Rank1458
Score99.487.584.762.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.84%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.3 ms87.4 ms105.2 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency35.7 ms100.0 ms122.7 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency76.3 ms125.9 ms147.9 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.34 blocks0.42 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited001,21819,703
Unsupported0000
Samples115,576112,756114,10723,976

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsNodeReal

+11.9points

  • Latency+12.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +11.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsBlast API

+14.7points

  • Latency+14.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +14.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+37.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +37.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time