Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:15:58 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlydRPCMerkle1RPC
Rank2368
Score96.892.178.462.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.93%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms33.9 ms106.9 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency50.3 ms71.8 ms195.6 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency737.7 ms170.2 ms242.7 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited066018,09819,373
Unsupported002210
Samples112,778110,92626,11623,598

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsdRPC

+4.7points

  • Latency+4.8
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +4.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.3points

  • Latency+18.4
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.3points

  • Latency+27.4
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +34.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time