Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 14:14:34 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricdRPCMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank379
Score88.469.50.0
StatusGoodDegradedPoor
Availability99.95%99.91%0.00%
p50 latency33.9 ms123.6 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency73.1 ms214.6 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency172.5 ms236.4 ms0.0 ms
Correctness100.00%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.35 blocks0.39 blocksno cohort
Rate limited3701,460
Unsupported000
Samples8,3518,4751,675

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against dRPC, the highest scorer of those selected.

dRPCvsMEV Blocker

+18.9points

  • Latency+18.8
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +18.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

dRPCvs1RPC

+88.4points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Latency*+18.8
  • Head freshness*+9.6

The parts add to +88.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time