Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:14:53 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodedRPCMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1378
Score99.492.177.562.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.93%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.2 ms33.9 ms119.2 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency35.5 ms71.8 ms210.3 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency75.9 ms170.2 ms233.9 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.36 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0659319,367
Unsupported0000
Samples113,619110,896112,52923,592

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+7.3points

  • Latency+7.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+21.9points

  • Latency+22.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+37.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +37.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time