Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 2.9 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 18:12:40 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlydRPC1RPC
Rank1238
Score99.496.792.162.4
StatusExcellentExcellentExcellentDegraded
Availability99.98%99.96%99.93%84.99%
p50 latency19.2 ms19.8 ms33.9 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency35.5 ms50.3 ms71.8 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency75.9 ms738.3 ms170.2 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.36 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0065919,357
Unsupported0000
Samples113,555112,689110,83723,581

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+2.7points

  • Latency+2.6
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +2.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsdRPC

+7.3points

  • Latency+7.4
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+37.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +37.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time