Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 3.0 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:46:07 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyMerkleMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2678
Score97.078.477.562.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.98%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms106.9 ms119.3 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency49.1 ms195.5 ms210.5 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency725.2 ms242.2 ms234.0 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%100.00%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.49 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited018,481319,792
Unsupported022500
Samples115,20926,684114,99524,078

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsMerkle

+18.6points

  • Latency+18.6
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +18.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.5points

  • Latency+19.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.6points

  • Latency+27.6
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +34.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time