Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

7d window · 3.0 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 19:43:01 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyBlast APIMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2578
Score97.084.777.562.4
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.98%99.89%84.99%
p50 latency19.8 ms105.2 ms119.3 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency49.1 ms122.7 ms210.5 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency725.6 ms148.0 ms234.1 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.42 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited01,218319,774
Unsupported0000
Samples115,125114,550114,91024,058

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsBlast API

+12.2points

  • Latency+12.3
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +12.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+19.5points

  • Latency+19.6
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +19.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+34.6points

  • Latency+27.6
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +34.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time