Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.4 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 06:20:18 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2478
Score94.888.377.962.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.97%99.80%99.89%85.27%
p50 latency19.8 ms87.3 ms118.5 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency62.3 ms99.9 ms209.2 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency836.9 ms124.4 ms232.7 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.35 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited00216,034
Unsupported0000
Samples93,44691,86893,27619,778

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+6.5points

  • Latency+6.6
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +6.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+16.9points

  • Latency+17.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +16.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+32.3points

  • Latency+25.4
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +32.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time