Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.6 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:06:24 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyNodeRealMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank2478
Score95.388.077.862.5
StatusExcellentGoodGoodDegraded
Availability99.96%99.81%99.89%85.27%
p50 latency19.8 ms87.4 ms118.6 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency58.3 ms100.1 ms209.3 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency811.0 ms125.9 ms232.6 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%99.99%97.48%
Head lag0.50 blocks0.35 blocks0.40 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited00317,090
Unsupported0000
Samples99,54297,87799,37220,984

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsNodeReal

+7.3points

  • Latency+7.5
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability+0.1
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +7.3, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+17.6points

  • Latency+17.7
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +17.6, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+32.8points

  • Latency+26.0
  • Availability+5.9
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +32.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time