Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:44:30 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkle1RPC
Rank1268
Score99.499.277.958.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.98%100.00%75.73%
p50 latency18.2 ms19.6 ms107.1 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.2 ms36.2 ms194.8 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency73.8 ms172.6 ms247.0 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.47 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited006,1356,592
Unsupported00810
Samples38,76338,4458,8057,909

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.2points

  • Latency+0.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +0.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+21.5points

  • Latency+21.5
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +21.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+40.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.7
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time