Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 04:43:39 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1278
Score99.499.277.058.5
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.98%99.91%75.73%
p50 latency18.2 ms19.6 ms119.5 ms2024.4 ms
p95 latency35.2 ms36.2 ms210.4 ms6590.4 ms
p99 latency73.8 ms172.8 ms234.1 ms9196.2 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%99.99%96.63%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.39 blocks0.95 blocks
Rate limited0026,587
Unsupported0000
Samples38,73938,42338,3627,904

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.2points

  • Latency+0.2
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0
  • Availability0.0

The parts add to +0.2, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMEV Blocker

+22.4points

  • Latency+22.5
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +22.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+40.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+9.7
  • Correctness+0.7
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +40.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time