Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

24h window · 24 hours observed · generated 2026-08-26 21:28:35 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyNodeReal1RPC
Rank1248
Score99.498.786.664.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.96%100.00%89.75%
p50 latency18.8 ms19.8 ms87.4 ms259.6 ms
p95 latency34.4 ms37.8 ms100.1 ms2579.7 ms
p99 latency72.0 ms298.3 ms124.7 ms4625.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.98%100.00%98.18%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.49 blocks0.35 blocks0.94 blocks
Rate limited0006,523
Unsupported0000
Samples38,33838,07837,3977,811

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+0.7points

  • Latency+0.7
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0

The parts add to +0.7, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsNodeReal

+12.8points

  • Latency+13.0
  • Head freshness0.2
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +12.8, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+35.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+4.1
  • Head freshness+0.5
  • Correctness+0.4

The parts add to +35.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time