Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

30d window · 2.8 days observed · generated 2026-08-27 15:28:24 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricPublicNodeTenderlyMerkle1RPC
Rank1268
Score99.496.378.562.4
StatusExcellentExcellentGoodDegraded
Availability99.98%99.96%99.98%84.99%
p50 latency18.9 ms19.8 ms106.7 ms225.7 ms
p95 latency34.8 ms52.4 ms195.9 ms4391.3 ms
p99 latency74.1 ms764.6 ms243.5 ms7602.5 ms
Correctness99.99%99.99%100.00%97.48%
Head lag0.49 blocks0.50 blocks0.48 blocks0.91 blocks
Rate limited0017,38918,586
Unsupported002120
Samples109,085108,25425,06922,702

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against PublicNode, the highest scorer of those selected.

PublicNodevsTenderly

+3.1points

  • Latency+3.1
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +3.1, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevsMerkle

+20.9points

  • Latency+20.9
  • Head freshness0.0
  • Availability0.0
  • Correctness0.0

The parts add to +20.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

PublicNodevs1RPC

+37.0points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Availability+6.0
  • Correctness+0.5
  • Head freshness+0.5

The parts add to +37.0, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Latency over time