Skip to content

Providers

Compare RPC providers on measured data

The top 4 on the chosen chain are compared by default. Pick your own — up to 4 — and the selection moves into the URL, so a comparison can be sent to someone else and they will see exactly what you saw.

Providers on Ethereum

Side by side

6h window · 6.0 hours observed · generated 2026-08-27 10:48:25 UTC

Selected providers compared across every measured metric
MetricTenderlyPublicNodeMEV Blocker1RPC
Rank1279
Score99.498.969.50.0
StatusExcellentExcellentDegradedPoor
Availability99.94%99.98%99.94%0.00%
p50 latency19.3 ms20.3 ms120.6 ms0.0 ms
p95 latency34.3 ms36.0 ms209.6 ms0.0 ms
p99 latency122.5 ms89.9 ms228.6 ms0.0 ms
Correctness100.00%99.99%100.00%not measured
Head lag0.48 blocks0.49 blocks0.41 blocksno cohort
Rate limited0011,624
Unsupported0000
Samples9,3959,4789,3861,859

9 providers scored against each other.

Where the gap comes from

Two scores side by side say one is higher. This says why: the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart, and each component’s share of the difference adds back to the difference exactly. Compared against Tenderly, the highest scorer of those selected.

TenderlyvsPublicNode

+0.5points

  • Latency+0.5
  • Availability0.0
  • Head freshness+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +0.5, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

TenderlyvsMEV Blocker

+29.9points

  • Latency+30.0
  • Head freshness0.1
  • Availability+0.0
  • Correctness+0.0

The parts add to +29.9, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart.

Tenderlyvs1RPC

+99.4points

  • Availability+40.0
  • Latency*+30.0
  • Correctness*+20.0
  • Head freshness*+9.4

The parts add to +99.4, exactly — the score is a weighted sum, so it comes apart. Components marked * were measured for only one of the two; the other’s weight is spread across what it does have, which is why the two sides can carry different weights for the same row.

Latency over time